Chrome OSdev computer code only justwent populace , but Phoronix has already throw it on aSamsung NC10netbook to test its performance and assault and battery - life against Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10 , Moblin 2.1 , Fedora 12 , and openSUSE 11.2 . Interesting resultant role forrader .
https://gizmodo.com/get-google-chrome-os-now-5408931
Ultimately , Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10 did the good , and openSUSE 11.2 also did well . But Chrome OS performance was far from spectacular . That should n’t be a vast surprise , though . It ’s not slat to ship for like a yr , and its carrying into action should pickup as builds stay . The principal surprise looks to beMoblin 2.1’scomparatively dull speed , despite Intel ’s exploit to optimize it for netbooks . It looks pretty , though .
https://gizmodo.com/hands-on-with-moblin-2-1-os-the-netbook-linux-anyone-c-5374784
All distros were test with default contour / packages , except forChrome OS . They “ involve to remount the ancestor file - system in a read - write modal value and supply in the standardUbuntu Karmicpackage deposit for which Google ’s operating system is based . ”
https://gizmodo.com/ubuntu-9-10-an-important-step-forward-room-to-improve-5408196
The Phoronix test suite included H.264 telecasting playback , OpenArena , LZMA and 7 - Zip file compression , IOzone , PostMark , WAV to OGG audio recording and H.264 television encryption . Full test results at : [ PhoronixviaSlashdot ]
ChromiumComputingGoogleGoogle Chrome O
Daily Newsletter
Get the good tech , scientific discipline , and culture news in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
