Here ’s the salutary reason ever why your genus Bos should give you a pay raise : severalize them if they pay you more money , you ’ll give up fume . I have in mind they do n’t desire you to get genus Cancer do they ? Statistically speaking , it could be dead on target , even if the money is n’t conditional on quitting . To be fair , the essence is subtle , and there is that lilliputian thing about needing to be a smoking carriage in the first position . Still , even if it does n’t get you a gravid paycheck , the coefficient of correlation may have implications for social insurance policy .
The title that high pay helps citizenry quit tobacco is hardly obvious . After all , the additional disposable income give smokers the opportunity to luxuriate their addiction further . On the other hand , theassociation between poverty and smokingis well established .
Dr. Juan Duof Old Dominion University and ProfessorPaul Leighof the University of California , Davis , wanted to explore the factors that influence quitting smoking , rather than the much more studied risk factors for begin . Using data for people aged 21 - 65 , they looked to see how income influenced event .
" We assume that people begin smoking for reasons other than wages,“saidLeigh . " About 90 percent of tobacco user in the United States started smoking before age 20 , so the data captured a sample of most full - time worker who have ever smoke . "
Du and Leigh compared individuals ' wages each yr with whether they smoked the year after . The result was hardly consuming , but in theAnnals of Epidemiologythe dyad report , “ We establish some evidence that low wages lead to more smoke in the overall sampling and substantial grounds for men , somebody with high school day educations or less . ”
“ result indicated that 10 % increases in wages lead to 5.5 and 4.6 percentage spot fall in smoking for men and the less enlightened , ” they contribute . “ They also increased the average chance of quitting among base - class smoking car from 17.0 % to 20.4 % . ”
The fact that women ’s smoking was apparently uninfluenced by wages raises questions as to how whole the effect may be . If real , it may have less to do with disposable income than the sense of self - Charles Frederick Worth associated with high remuneration , since increase family income from source besides their own salary did not seem to aid men quit .
Nevertheless , Du and Leigh point out that American states with higher minimal remuneration and unionization rate have lower rates of smoking , lending some support to their finale , although there are manyconfounding factorsto consider .
As uncertain as the results may be from this study alone , Leigh and Du have antecedently demonstratednegative wellness effects from low payand shown these canremain after retirement . Leighsaid , " Our finding tot to the existing body of epidemiological lit depict that scurvy income predicts hapless health habits . They also show that higher lower limit remuneration could reduce the preponderance of smoking . "
