When you buy through links on our web site , we may earn an affiliate perpetration . Here ’s how it works .
DENVER — Exactly how many people might startsmoking marijuanain states where it becomes sound could vary widely depending on the particular of each state ’s Torah , such as whether employer can displace someone for smoke it , according to a young study .
In fact , more than 50 pct of Americans surveyed for the discipline changed their minds about whether they would smoke pot , depending on whether the legal philosophy specified certain penalties , the bailiwick found .
" Legalization is n’t a ' yes or no ' question , " said lead researcher Mike McLaughlin , a doctorial nominee at the Yale School of Public Health , who presented the findings here today ( Oct. 31 ) at the coming together of the American Public Health Association . " There are a lot of details that policymakers call for to work out if legalisation is cash in one’s chips to be implemented . "
For the study , McLaughlin surveyed more than 500 adults ages 21 and older living in four states where marijuana legalization is on the ballot this election — Arizona , California , Massachusetts and Florida — and in one province where marijuana legalization is likely to be voted on in the near future tense , Michigan . [ Marijuana Legalization 2016 : A Voter Guide ]
Participants were ask whether they woulduse marijuanaif it were legal , but under different scenarios , include the following :
About 20 percentage of participants allege they would use pot no matter what if it was legal , and 26 percent allege they would never use it , even if it was sound . But 54 percentage of participant changed their minds depending on the scenario .
The big gist was seen for the scenario take employers — amarijuana lawthat prevent employers from having insurance that could top to the firing of employee for using marijuana international work would lead to a 9 percent increase in the percentage of people using marijuana , the study found . In contrast , raising the terms of marijuana by $ 19 per gram would lead to a 5 per centum decrease in the figure of multitude using the drug .
McLaughlin noted that , when applied to a commonwealth ’s entire population , those percentages could signify quite a tumid number of people . " These are not tiny act , " McLaughlin said . " These have the potential to make a really large cut " in marijuana utilization , he said .
The drug remains illegal under Union law ; in 2015 , the Colorado Supreme Court find that employers in the state could still burn employees for using marijuana when they were n’t at piece of work .
The findings suggest that even within legalisation , there is way for policymakers to influence people ’s decisions to use marijuana , with different case of policies , he say .
McLaughlin said the subject field did not ask participants whether they were currently using marijuana , and that it ’s not clear if this could strike the findings .
Original article onLive Science .
